FindLaw | Cases and Codes

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Find Law for legal professionals and international law aspirants. Your search for International Courts judgements ends here...
Read more

Contracts Knowledge | Intention to Contract:

Contracts Knowledge | Intention to Contract:

Useful website for contract law aspirants and Law students.
Read more

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: National Case Law

National Case Law
/ /
INDEX OF CASES
Collected at theNational Consultation on the PWDVA, 2005


Andhra Pradesh
High Court
Afalunnisa Begum v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Umesh Prasad Maharana v. State of AP, [MANU/AP/0206/2009]
M. Nirmala v. Dr. Gandla Balakotaiah, [2008(3) ALD 486AP]


Assam
High Court
Rina Devi Bora v. Dwijen Chandra Bora, [2009(4) GLT 432 Cr.R.P.149/2009]

Lower Courts
Rita Rani Tickoo v. Dabashish Sharma, [Case no-62m/09]
Tasmina Begum v. T. Bora, [Case No. 101M/109]
Sabita Das v. Pradip Dutta & others., [Case no.76m/09]
Beauty Das v. Sunil Das, [99m/09]
Sabina Begum v. Aftab Ali & Others., [Case No. 65m/09]
Hemaprava Devi v. RupakMahanta, [Case no 124m/09]
Smt. Mrigakshi Bordoloi v. Sri Pankaj Roy Bordoloi, [Case no 153m/09]
Neera Talukdar v. Dhaneshwar choudhury, [15m/09]
Manju Rajbonshi v. Munindra Rajbonshi, [11m/09]


Chhattisgarh
High Court
Rajesh Kurre v. Safurabai, [2009(1) MPHT 37 CHH]
Smt. Neetu Singh v. Sunil Singh, [MJC 592/05, 24/02/2010]
Lower Courts
Hem Bai Sahu v. Pyarelal Sahu, [MJC 1/09]
Manju Tiwari v. Radhelal Tiwari & Ors., [Cr. 228/06]
Rachna Rao v. Family Court Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, [W.A 273/09]


Delhi
High Court
Manish Tandon v. State of Delhi, [Manu/DE/3007/2009 Del]
Sarbjyot Kaur Saluja v. Rajender Singh Saluja, [148 2008 DLT 650 Del]
Dr. Sunil Kumar v. State, [Govt. of NCT Delhi) II (2008) DMC 212 Del]
Amit Sundra v. Sheetal Khanna, [2008 CriLJ66 I(2008)DMC5]
Nidhi Kumar Gandhi v. The State, [157 (2009) DLT 472 Del]
Meena Chaudhary v. Commissioner of Police, [MANU/DE/0024/2009
Suresh Khullar v. Vijay Kumar Khullar, [MANU/DE/8505/2007]
Aruna Parmod Shah v. Union of India, [WP. Crl.425/2008Del]
Narendra Pal Kaur Chawala v. Najit Singh A.I.R, [2008 Delhi p.7]
Lower Courts
Kajal Gohri v. Surinder Gohri, [MP/106/107]


Goa
High Court
Virginai Reguia Da Silva Labo v. Julis Carms Labo, [Cr.W.P22/2008]
Mrs. D’Louza, Widow of late Judas D’Souza v. Mrs. Assumpta D’souza, [Cr. Revision Application No 43/2009; dated 08/02/10]
Bharati Naik v. Ramnath Halarnkar, [Cri Writ Petition 18/09, 64/09 High court of Goa; order dated 17/02/10]


Gujarat
High Court
Jaydipsinh Prabhatsinh Jhala & ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., [Spl.Cr.Ap. 2068/2009 with Cr.Misc. Ap. 9440/2009 on 21/12/2009]
Pushpaben Umeshbhai Patel & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr., [Sp.Cr.Ap. 2115/2007 on 30/10/07]



Karnataka
High Court
B.P. Achala Anand v. Appi Reddy, [I 9(2005) DMC 345 SC: (2005) 3 SCC 313, Supreme Court]
Khaja Hussain v. Razia Sultana, [CRIMINAL PETITIOM No. 8683/2008, 15/01/09]
Lower Courts
Shaheen Kausar v. Md. Chand Pasha, [Cr. Misc. 2/2007, 4/7/2007]
Bhimavva v. Doddappa, [CRIL.MISC.NO.23/2007, 16/06/07]
Smt. Durgamma v. Venkatesh, Ambanna, Chandri, Durgappa, Jambanna, [CRL.MISC.NO.58/07, 01/12/09]
Smt. Shaheen Kauser v. Md. Chand Pasha, [CRL.MISC.NO.2/2007, 4/07/07]
Basamma v. Virupakshappa Patil, [CRI.MISC.NO.5/2007, 14/09/07]


Kerala
High Court
Priya v. Shibu, [MANU/KE/0265/2008, Ker]
Anilkumar v. Sindhu, [2009 (2) KLJ 152 Ker]
P. Chandrasekhra Pillai v. Vasala Chandran, [ I (2008) DMC 83 Ker; Crl MC No. 53 of 2007]
Thanseel v. Sini, [MANU/KE/0123/2007]
M.A. Mony v. M.P Leelamma, [2007 Cri.LJ 2604:2007 (2) KLJ 209 Ker]
K.E. Jose v. State of Kerala, [2008 (1) KLJ 871 Ker]
Chithrangathan v. Seema, [I (2008) DMC 365Ker]
Lower Courts
Nazeera v. Rasaque, [CMP 1291/2007, 14/8/2007]
Nazeera v. Sayao Saifulla, [M.C.58/2007, 17/10/07]
Ancy v. Mathew, [M.C. 63/2008, 26/07/08]
Omana v. Sujeev Kumar, [CMP. 1335/2007, 8/08/07]
Rasheeda.P.M v. Aleema, Noushad, [MC 50/2007, 6/09/08]
Reena v. Vishal Sharma, [M.C. 51/2008, 30/06/08]
A.M. Krishnaveni v. Unnikrishnan Madathil, [M.C.58/08, 1/11/08]
M. Unnikrishnan v. A.M. Krishnveni, [ORIGINAL PETITION NO. 29/06, 19/03/07]
Maymooma v. Shoukkathali, [CMP-2901/07, 31/07/07]


Madhya Pradesh
High Court
Razzak Khan v. Shahnaz Khan, [2008 (4) MPHT 413MP]
Ajay Kant v. Alka Sharma, [ I (2008) DMC 1 MP]


Maharashtra
High Court
Archana Naik v. Urmilaben Naik, [MANU/MH/0994/2009]
Vishal Damodar Patil v. Vishakha Vishal Patil, [2009 Cri. LJ 107 Bom]
Nandkishor Vinchurkar v. Kavita Vinchurkar, [MANU/MH/0957/2009, Bom]
Rajkumar Rampal Pandey v. Sarita Rajkumar Pandey, [2008 (6) Bom. CR 831]
Shammi Nagpal v. Sudhir Nagpal, Director Taj-President, Indian Hotels Company Ltd. And Commissioner of Police, [2008 (5) Bom CR149: (2008) 110BomLR1797]
Bindiya A. Chawla v. Ajay Lajpatrai Chawla, [2009(5) Bom.CR 486]
Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Subra Chakrabarti, [Cri.No. 2675/1995, Supreme Court]
Tulsa and Ors. v. Durghatiya and Ors., [India 2008 (1) UJ SC 0156, MANU/SC/0424/2008, Supreme Court]
Lower Courts
Geeta Majkar v. jayesh Suresh Ghare [C.CNo. 334/2009]
Sana Sheikh v. Ibrahim Sheikh [Case No. 416/Misc./2007]
Naseem Bano Sheikh Mahmood v. Naeem and Nadeem Shaikh Mahmood


Nagaland
Sanchita Sen v. Partho Sen, [Cr.No. 17/2008]


Rajasthan
High Court
Nishi Gupta v. Rahul Gupta, [MANU/RH/1054/2008]
Sarita v. Umrao, [MANU/ RH/ 0873/2007]
Nand Kishore v. State of Rajasthan, [MANU/RH/0636/2008]
Madhu Bala v. Prital Kumar Rao, [RLW 2009 (1) Raj 827]


Tamil Nadu
High Court
S Meenavathi v. Senthamarai Selvi, [MANU/TN/2547/2009]
Amar Kumar Mahadevan v. Karthiyayini, [MANU/TN/9632/2007 Mad]
M Palani v. Meenakshi, [AIR 2008 Mad 162; C.R.P. No. 238 of 2008; MANU/TN/0820/2008]
A.V.Rojer v. J. Janet Sudha, [MANU/TN/8493/2007 Mad]
Sarvanakumar v. Thenmozhi, [MANU/TN/9828/2007, Mad]
Dennison Paulraj v. Mayawinola, [MANU/TN/0525/08, Mad]
Lakshmanan v. Sangeetha, [MANU/TN/2853/2009 Mad]
M. Sripriya v. P.V Kamakshidsan, [MANU/TN/2690/2009, Mad]
P Babu Venkatesh v. Rani, [Mad 25th Mar 2008; MANU/TN/0612/2008]


Uttar Pradesh
High Court
Milan Kumar Singh v. State of UP, [2007 Cri.LJ 4740, All; MANU/UP/0827/2007; dated 18/07/07]
Azimuddin Abdul Aziz v. State of U.P, [Manu/UP/0238/2008, All]
Lower Courts
Hamida Khatoon v. Irphan Ali, [889/IX/2006]
Pragya v. Vishnu, [772/IX/2006]


West Bengal
Lower Courts
Tapaji Roy v. Dilip ber Roy, [MISC-8/08]
Wahedom Biwi v. Mulhjal Ahmed, [C-2320/09]
Banani Ghosh v. Ajindaa Najh Ghosh, [C-638/08]
Paramita Biswas v. Paaksh Charjaa Biswas, [C-/1204/2007]
Laremi Sevi Sonkar v. Pnahlad Sonkar Smt.Laxmi Devi Sonkar v. Sri Prahalad Sonkar and three others, [C-/1483/08]

source: http://wji-hrln.blogspot.com/p/national-case-law.html
Read more

498a.org Discussion Forum

Read more

Checklist before contested divorce or mutual divorce (useful for Lawyers)

Name of the Husband and Wife
[As in Official Record] :

E-Mail ID :

Phone No of both :

Addresses of both
[As in Official Record] :

Age of both
[As in Official Record] :

Current employment details of the spouses :

Date of Marriage
[As in Official Record] :

Place of Marriage & Place of its Registration
[As in Official Record] :

Details of property to be exchanged and details thereof :

Whether amount to be paid on any account between the parties are agreed? :

Whether there are children out of the wedlock? :

Address where last resided together
as husband and wife: :

Date when both of them started living
separately without any further reunion :

Whether there are any issues to be
resolved before applying for divorce? :

Whether divorce by mutual consent is possible? :

Details of Reliefs needed from court :

Any other details required for the case like whether you tried if so when, for a Conciliation and why it did not get through
Read more

DV Judgements « Fighting injustice, due to Misuse of "Gender biased laws" www.498a.org.in (legal advice) www.family-harmony.org(NGO Related site) National Family Harmony Society-Reg NGO 498A HelpLine-9880141531-9731569970

Read more

Excerpts And Judgments To Fight Domestic Violence Act Cases « IPC 498A

Excerpts And Judgments To Fight Domestic Violence Act Cases « IPC 498A: "Shaleen Kabra DV Act Judgment:  You can read about this story here: A Delhi additional sessions court has ruled that allegations of domestic violence need to be proved and victims need to face cross-examination and provide evidence in support of their charges to be liable for relief. This ruling was upheld by the Delhi High Court. This is marked in red as this blows a hole in the DV Act. The judgments are given below:"
Read more